WebChin Keow v Government of Malaysia & Anor An amah was given a penicillin injection at a clinic. She died about an hour later. PC overturned the decision of FC and agree with the HC that the doctor had been negligent as it was expressly written on the patient’s card that she was allergic to penicillin.

Brief overview of medical negligence in Nigeria - Lexology

WebAn example of Malaysian case that has adopted the “pure transplant” approach in Bolam test will be Chin Keow v Government of Malaysia.[ [1967] 2 MLJ 145] In this case the medical practitioner failed to inquire whether the patient was allergic to the penicillin injection as she had suffered from the adverse reactions before. Web“The classic statement of the standard of care of a professional exercising some special skill or competence is contained in the direction of McNair J in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [2] which was cited with approval by Sir Hugh Wooding in Chin Keow v Government of Malaysia: [3] eagle craft plymouth ind truck caps

The Bolam Test: An Unfair Decision in the Torts of Professional ...

Web9 Chin Keow v Government of Malaysia [1967] 2 MLJ 45 at 47 (Privy Council); Swamy v Matthews [1968] 1 MLJ 138 at 139 (Federal Court); and . Dr Chin Yoon Hiap v Ng Eu Khoon [1998] 1 MLJ 57 at 73 (Court of Appeal). 10 See, for example, the Malaysian High Court cases of . Kamalam a/l Raman v Eastern Plantation Agency [1996] 4 MLJ 674 at 690; WebChin Keow v. Government of Malaysia & Anor [1967] 1 LNS 25; [1967] 1 MLJ 138. In 2002, the Federal Court decision in Dr. Soo Fook Mun v. Foo Fio Na & Anor [2002] 2 … WebThe Federal Court, in answering the leave question aforementioned, looked into the development of the Bolam test in Malaysia, as propounded in Bolam v Friern Management Committee. (2) Development of Bolam test. The Bolam test became the applicable law in relation to medical negligence following Chin Keow v Government of the Federation of … csif boletin