WebJul 14, 2015 · Du Plessis v Tager 1953 (2) SA 5 (O) Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949 (2) SA 470 (O) De Witts Auto Body Repairs v Fedgen Insurance Co Ltd 1994 (4) SA 705. … Web(See Grant v. Plumbers (Pty) Ltd. 1949 (2) S.A. 470) In the present case the applicant has shown that it never. 6. filed a notice of intention to defend the action because the summons was duly served upon the the applicant. Thereafter it was delivered to its attorneys. Unfortunately it never reached the attorney of record
Maleke v Lesotho National General Insurance Company Limited …
WebFor the aforementioned, the respondent rely on, inter alia, Silber v Ozen Wholesalers (Pty)Ltd 1954 (2) SA 345 (A) at 352 G-H , PLG van Rensburg en Vennote v Den Dulk … WebJul 1, 2004 · In Leweis v Sampoio 2000 NR 186 (SC) at 191G-H this Court approved the following content given to the requirements implied by that phrase in Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd, 1949 (2) SA 470 (0) at 476-477: “ (a) He … cupom 30% shein
Mandoro v Lesotho Evangelical Church (CIV/T/271/83) …
http://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2024/623.pdf Web1999 (4) SA p BLIEDEN J 'In Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949 (2) SA 470 (O) Brink J, in dealing with a similar provision, held (at 476) that in order to show good cause an applicant should comply with the following requirements: ... Web5 Grant v Plumbers (Pty) Ltd 1949 (2) SA 470 (O) 5 only came to court on the 31st May, 2013 to bring the current rescission application. [8] By this time the applicant was aware that the vehicle in question had already been sold. Be that as it may, the applicant does not bother to inform the easy christmas potluck food ideas